Prof. Akilagpa Sawyer calls Free SHS policy “unintelligent” for benefiting the wrong group.

Prof. Akilagpa Sawyer speaks

Professor Akilagpa Sawyerr, a renowned academic and former Vice Chancellor of the University of Ghana, has expressed his disappointment and frustration with the implementation of the Free Senior High School (SHS) policy. Despite acknowledging the policy’s good intentions and benefits, he believes that its execution is fundamentally flawed and “unintelligent”.

READ: Ex-President Mahama to engage with press

Professor Sawyerr’s concerns are rooted in the policy’s universal applicability, which he argues benefits those who can already afford to pay for their children’s education. Meanwhile, other students who lack basic resources, such as desks, are left behind. He questions the logic of providing free education to those who can afford it while neglecting those who need it most.

The professor emphasizes that the pursuit of free education without careful planning and consideration of its impact on the economy is a failure of policy. He argues that the government’s expenditure on the policy is unsustainable and could be better allocated to support those who genuinely need it. By providing free education to all, regardless of their financial situation, the government is essentially subsidizing the education of those who can already afford it.

Professor Sawyerr’s critique is not aimed at the concept of free education itself, which he acknowledges is laudable. Rather, he takes issue with the policy’s blanket application, which he believes is unfair and ineffective. He advocates for a targeted approach that prioritizes those who cannot afford education, ensuring that the policy benefits the state and the most vulnerable members of society.

The professor’s concerns are compounded by the lack of intelligent defense from government officials regarding the policy. He finds it appalling that no one can provide a well-reasoned justification for the policy’s implementation, which he believes highlights its inherent flaws. The absence of a coherent defense suggests that the policy was implemented without careful consideration of its consequences.

Furthermore, Professor Sawyerr argues that the policy’s universal applicability ignores the diverse needs of different communities. Some communities may require more resources and support than others, and a blanket policy fails to acknowledge these differences. By adopting a one-size-fits-all approach, the government is neglecting the unique challenges faced by various communities.

In addition, the professor believes that the policy’s implementation has led to a misallocation of resources. The government’s expenditure on free education for all could be better spent on other pressing needs, such as infrastructure development and healthcare. By prioritizing free education for those who need it most, the government can make a more significant impact on the economy and society.

ALSO READ: Funny Face files complaint over secret recording of his nakedness.

In conclusion, Professor Sawyerr’s statement highlights the need for a more thoughtful and targeted approach to the Free SHS policy. By restructuring the policy to cater to the needs of the underprivileged, the government can make a more significant impact on the economy and education sector. As it stands, the policy’s universal applicability and lack of intelligent defense make it an “unintelligent” use of resources. The government must reconsider its approach and adopt a more nuanced and effective strategy to ensure that education is accessible to all who need it.

FOR MORE; CLICK Here

About The Author

Prince Nti Adu

See author's posts